search

austgl / android-shuffle

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/android-shuffle
0 stars 0 forks source link

Shuffle 2.0.1 Appears to Have Forgotten How to Hide Active Activities #293

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hello all,

quoting 
http://code.google.com/p/android-shuffle/wiki/OnlineHelp#Entity_lifecycle :

An action is considered active if its project (if any) is active and at least 
one of its contexts (if any) are active.

I would assume this means that an action is considered inactive if its project 
(if any) is inactive or all of its contexts (if any) are inactive or it has 
neither a project nor a context.

However, I can't seem to get Schuffle 2.0.1 to act in this way. I have the 
Tickler configured to show all inactive actions which are neither deleted nor 
done. But it shows the same actions, no matter how I set the filter regarding 
the active state.

I tested with fresh installations on two different Android devices (2.2.1 and 
2.3.5).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by el.goog....@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2012 at 9:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I'm aware that I did not follow the rules to register a bug, but this issue is 
rather problematic for me. Because I need the "inactive" mechanism for a kind 
of a prirozation mechanism, in which I simply set everything that is overdue, 
not so important right now, but still not irrelevant to "inactive". Of course, 
without a view to effectively find those activities later, this approach is a 
bit useless.

Since it worked in Shuffle 1.7, maybe it has to do with the change that an 
action can be associated with several contexts.

Is there anything I can do to help you with this.

Original comment by el.goog....@gmail.com on 2 May 2012 at 9:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by andybry...@gmail.com on 10 Jun 2012 at 1:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Issue 297 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by andybry...@gmail.com on 10 Jun 2012 at 1:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Fixed in 2.0.2
The inactive filter query was wrong. It checked if there were any contexts and 
showed them if none of them were _inactive_ rather than none of them were 
_active_

Original comment by andybry...@gmail.com on 10 Jun 2012 at 7:18