Open czf opened 10 months ago
Can we be consistent with naming across this PR and #698 ? E.g. #698 uses DeleteMfaAuthenticatorRequest
, this PR uses AssociateNewAuthenticatorRequest
, while I think AssociateMfaAuthenticatorRequest
would be more consistent.
Can we be consistent with naming across this PR and #698 ? E.g. #698 uses
DeleteMfaAuthenticatorRequest
, this PR usesAssociateNewAuthenticatorRequest
, while I thinkAssociateMfaAuthenticatorRequest
would be more consistent.
renamed to AssociateMfaAuthenticatorRequest
Changes
Adding support for [/mfa/associate](The authentication client doesn't support mfa/associate) to authentication client Adding support for /oauth/token verification with OOB to authentication client
Added new methods to authentication client to support the API endpoints Added request/response classes
References
resolves #694
Testing
[x] This change adds integration test coverage
[x] This change has been tested on the latest version of the platform/language or why not
Checklist
[x] I have read the Auth0 general contribution guidelines
[x] I have read the Auth0 Code of Conduct
[x] All existing and new tests complete without errors