codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
b5ddc09) 94.78% compared to head (44c13ec) 94.78%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #196 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.78% 94.78% ======================================= Files 7 7 Lines 307 307 ======================================= Hits 291 291 Misses 12 12 Partials 4 4 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/auth0/go-jwt-middleware/pull/196?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [error\_handler.go](https://codecov.io/gh/auth0/go-jwt-middleware/pull/196?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0#diff-ZXJyb3JfaGFuZGxlci5nbw==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [extractor.go](https://codecov.io/gh/auth0/go-jwt-middleware/pull/196?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0#diff-ZXh0cmFjdG9yLmdv) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [validator/validator.go](https://codecov.io/gh/auth0/go-jwt-middleware/pull/196?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0#diff-dmFsaWRhdG9yL3ZhbGlkYXRvci5nbw==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=auth0):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
🔧 Changes
There is a compatibility issue between
Templum/govulncheck-actionand the latestgovulncheckjson format. This has been "fixed" for now inTemplum/govulncheck-action by setting the default version ofgovulncheckto a known working version, but by supplying"latest"we're overriding this fix. So for now don't set agovulncheck` version.This PR will most likely fail too as we're using
pull_request_targetwhich runs the action based on the workflow defined in the base of this PR rather than from the PR