in nginx I simply use a rewrite rule to the singular logo, the access log will nicely detail when the user has read the mail.
Then when sending my spam out, I nicely send a different selector, and voila.
I am thus really wondering why the selector has to exist, is it for tracking different spam campaigns?
Companies/organisations do not change logo every day, thus what is the selector really for (except that it copies a concept of DKIM....)
The selector also does not make it easy for caching the logos on a central (mail-provider-side) server.... having no selector would thus be very beneficial.
For every user I send something to I create a new selector:
in nginx I simply use a rewrite rule to the singular logo, the access log will nicely detail when the user has read the mail.
Then when sending my spam out, I nicely send a different selector, and voila.
I am thus really wondering why the selector has to exist, is it for tracking different spam campaigns?
Companies/organisations do not change logo every day, thus what is the selector really for (except that it copies a concept of DKIM....)
The selector also does not make it easy for caching the logos on a central (mail-provider-side) server.... having no selector would thus be very beneficial.
Please detail at least why the selector exists...