search

authindicators / rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification

Other
20 stars 6 forks source link

modified example for BIMI-Location header construction flow #6

Closed Lockhead closed 7 years ago

Lockhead commented 7 years ago

The initial example for the BIMI-Location header construction flow, would intentionally break DKIM further down the mail flow and with no references to ARC this should not be the base example for implementers. Additionally the wording around it and the following paragraphs indicated that this wasn't the intention.

AntiFreeze commented 7 years ago

The latest refresh of the doc is a lot clearer on how this flow works and when and where it happens. Additionally, the doc now expressly forbids signing the BIMI-Location header, and explains how MTAs communicate trust regarding the BIMI-Location header to downstream MUAs - a communication of trust that happens after dkim evaluation but before message display.

Does the current document resolve your concerns?