Closed babisRoutis closed 4 months ago
@babisRoutis Thank you for bringing this issue.
I guess that you are talking about the value of the cryptographic_binding_methods_supported
issuer metadata in the JSON returned from https://trial.authlete.net/.well-known/openid-credential-issuer.
Technically speaking, this is not an issue of java-oauth-server. It's an issue in the configuration of the credential issuer that is running on trial.authlete.net
.
If the value of the cryptographic_binding_methods_supported
issuer metadata is used to list the supported formats of keys in key proofs (not in verifiable credentials) (NOTE: As OpenID4VCI Issue 283 points out, this is not so clearly stated in the specification), another issue is raised. Although the "jwt Proof Type" section of the OID4VCI spec defines a method that utilizes the x5c
header parameter, the "Credential Issuer Metadata Parameters" section does not include a string constant that corresponds to x5c
.
Dear @TakahikoKawasaki
I guess that you are talking about the value of the
cryptographic_binding_methods_supported
issuer metadata in the JSON returned from https://trial.authlete.net/.well-known/openid-credential-issuer.
Indeed.
Technically speaking, this is not an issue of java-oauth-server. It's an issue in the configuration of the credential issuer that is running on
trial.authlete.net
.
That's clear
If the value of the
cryptographic_binding_methods_supported
issuer metadata is used to list the supported formats of keys in key proofs (not in verifiable credentials) (NOTE: As OpenID4VCI Issue 283 points out, this is not so clearly stated in the specification), another issue is raised. Although the "jwt Proof Type" section of the OID4VCI spec defines a method that utilizes thex5c
header parameter, the "Credential Issuer Metadata Parameters" section does not include a string constant that corresponds tox5c
.
I was about to comment on issue 283, that I find the definition of cryptographic_binding_methods_supported
confusing. :smile:
Initially, I had the impression that, as you describe, it expresses the ways a key can be found inside the proof.
My current understanding though, exactly because x5c
was missing, is that it expresses the format of keys in the issued VC.
I guess it should be clarified in VCI spec.
In the VCI issuer meta-data there is a
credential_configuration_id
namedIdentityCredential
which contains the following:To my understanding draft 13 of VCI doesn't specify the value
x5c
as an expectedcryptographic_binding_methods_supported
. Expected values arejwk
cose_key
did
did:XYZ