Open RokerHRO opened 6 years ago
I agree that the spec needs to be updated to be completed. It is not as high a priority as the rest of the autocrypt project, though.
Of you have some time to propose improvements or fixes to the specification as specific patches, that'd be great.
The over 2 years old draft looks more a rough collection of goals or ideas to me, and not a specification, yet.
So, sure, I can add my own ideas into that draft, but I think it would be far better when someone who knows the original plans / ideas / goals, how "Memory Hole" (I don't like that name, though) shall work, write them down.
My suggestions so far:
Perhaps if there is an EBNF grammar or the like it could also moved into an appendix.
That's all from me, for now. 🙂
The spect at https://github.com/autocrypt/memoryhole/blob/master/specs/draft-memoryhole.md is incomplete, yet. Is there another, newer, more complete draft / spec somewhere?
If yes, this file should be updated (or replaced by a redirect to the newer spec). If no, the spec should be finished immediately, so it can be implemented by 3rd party software, too.
What do you think?