This is a proposal to start discussion to formalize metadata tagging at the node definition level.
The proposal currently has two parts:
Support for a formal name tag / attribute name for metadata. e.g. metadata
Support structured data which may be in multiple languages in a standardized format that is easy to parse and write to.
Perhaps something like XLIFF (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLIFF).
The multi-language support is important to allow for data in arbtirary languages to be embedded.
If there are "standard" templates for metadata then they could be reused.
If not then structure data at least allows for a formal mechanism to group meta data that has some commonality.
For migration some existing data could already be in this or a compatible format (which could be mapped).
An additional property is that if metadata is added then it can be referenced and placed either in a separate location or
be placed in a separate section within the same document for readability. This would imply a metadata type / definition.
This is a proposal to start discussion to formalize metadata tagging at the node definition level. The proposal currently has two parts:
metadataAn additional property is that if metadata is added then it can be referenced and placed either in a separate location or be placed in a separate section within the same document for readability. This would imply a metadata type / definition.