Closed pierre-labastie closed 5 years ago
@jhuntwork or @bryan5989, do you want to test, or should I merge now?
Seems nobody wants to comment. Will do some more tests before merging.
Apologies, I've just been really busy the last few days. I'll try to take a look in a little bit.
Looks good to me. I really like all the details and the description you provide, in both the pull request description above, and in the related issue.
I haven't worked with xsl in a long time, and it's been a while since I looked at the book's structure. I also haven't tested the blfs portions of jhalfs. But your changes and reasons for change look good.
I'd be happy to merge it if you want. Would you prefer me to do it or for you to merge it yourself?
Let me merge it. It's mainly maintenance. I expect {B,}LFS editors to use master, so I owe them fixing my bugs...
likewise, been busy. Sorry for being aloof.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:15 AM Pierre Labastie notifications@github.com wrote:
Merged #14 https://github.com/automate-lfs/jhalfs/pull/14 into master.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/automate-lfs/jhalfs/pull/14#event-2324560164, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLQ6JJEUE3YER5CA5NRTJ3PUGMJ3ANCNFSM4HJ7ABOQ .
Changes proposed in this pull request:
preceding
/following
instead ofpreceding-sibling
/following-sibling
. But limit to nodes having a common sect2 ancestor. This allows finding the preceding or following screen tags, only when they are in the install role. Fixes #13@automate-lfs/automate-lfs-repo-admins