Closed tomaz-suller closed 4 months ago
hi @tomaz-suller, thanks a lot for your interest in NASLib. We haven't actually considered using Optuna when developing the NASLib, mainly for 2 reasons:
I would be interested to know your observations on the significant overlaps that NASLib has with Optuna.
Cheers, Arber
Thanks for your response. My comment really came from a too simplistic view of NAS, and in fact I didn't know about gradient-based or other approaches which didn't treat the problem as a black-box optimisation one.
Hi. I'm starting a new research project on NAS and found out about your library, which seemed really interesting but also seemed to overlap significantly with the more popular Optuna. I was curious to see if you had considered using it prior to developing your own library, and if so which drawbacks led you to develop your own tools.
In a previous research project also in NAS, we used Optuna since we didn't require much sophisticated control over the algorithms (though Optuna does allow for that with e.g. custom samplers), and we were very much implementation-oriented rather than research-oriented.
Having feedback will help a lot in using the most suitable tool for the job. Thanks in advance!