Closed gomezzz closed 7 months ago
I'm not sure why that (9)
is uncommeneted in the last cell block of the example, I need to fix that!
The # (9)!
is essentially for the generated documentation of the example page
if __name__ == "__main__":
scheduler.run(timeout=5, wait=True) # (9)!
# 9. We use [`Scheduler.run()`][amltk.scheduling.Scheduler.run] to run the scheduler.
# Here we set it to run briefly for 5 seconds and wait for remaining tasks to finish
# before continuing.
It seems to be identical and work for the others but not this one.
Good issue!
Yes, commenting out the (9)
fixed it for me :v:
A small suggestion for the HPO examples. For interpretability and user understanding I would suggest not to print the entire dataframe at the end but just some of the columns e.g.
print(
trial_history.df()[
[
"config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:criterion",
"config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:max_features",
"config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:n_estimators",
"metric:accuracy [0.0, 1.0] (maximize)",
"summary:train/acc",
"summary:val/acc",
"summary:test/acc",
]
]
)
that makes it much easier to understand what is shown as you get this :)
Trial history:
config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:criterion config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:max_features config:Pipeline:RandomForestClassifier:n_estimators metric:accuracy [0.0, 1.0] (maximize) summary:train/acc summary:val/acc summary:test/acc
name
config_id=1_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instanc... log_loss 0.05857 100 0.75 1.0 0.75 0.76
config_id=2_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instanc... gini 0.877733 39 0.73 1.0 0.73 0.74
config_id=3_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instanc... entropy 0.49934 68 0.735 1.0 0.735 0.775
config_id=4_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instanc... entropy 0.568753 14 0.71 0.996667 0.71 0.73
config_id=5_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instanc... log_loss 0.350444 49 0.75 1.0 0.75 0.795
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
config_id=60_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instan... log_loss 0.494299 91 0.76 1.0 0.76 0.78
config_id=61_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instan... log_loss 0.549975 90 0.745 1.0 0.745 0.79
config_id=62_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instan... log_loss 0.606144 91 0.735 1.0 0.735 0.77
config_id=63_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instan... log_loss 0.57088 90 0.745 1.0 0.745 0.795
config_id=64_seed=1608637542_budget=None_instan... gini 0.659984 84 0.755 1.0 0.755 0.765
After the workaround with swig mentioned in #273 I am trying the HPO examples now. The first one works well but for the second I receive
I tried increasing the timeout to 30 to see if that would fixed but without success. Is there anything else I might have to change?
(opened as part of JOSS Review https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6367 )