Open Shanci-Li opened 2 months ago
Hi Shanci, thank you for your interest! Yes, our provided data do not include the intensity of SICK scans.
Hi Yiyi! Thanks for your help! Besides the SICK intensity, I have a question regarding an explanation about Velodyne intensity you had in another issue #73 : 'Also, values above 100 indicate retro-reflective targets.'. I checked the distribution of the intensity in the accumulated point cloud I had recovered, the normalized intensity mostly ranges from 0-0.4 (which is 0-100 for an 8-bit scale). To generalize the dataset with the high-accuracy lidar scans (intensity in 16 bits), do you think it is a good idea to cut off the intensity above 0.4 and normalize the intensity again? (I observed that the intensity from high-accuracy LiDAR generally follows a shifted Gaussian Distribution between 0-65535). I am not sure whether retro-reflective targets are important in semantic segmentation applications. I would apprentice it if you can give some suggestions on the data processing.
Best regards, Shanci
Hi Yiyi! Thanks for your great work and effort in maintaining the repo. I am currently trying to generate the accumulated point clouds with intensity from raw 3D data. For Velodyne, I know the intensity is saved in the 4th column in the binary file. But it seems there are only 2 columns for SICK scans. Does that mean there is no intensity provided with SICK scans?
Best regards, Shanci