Open TakaHoribe opened 1 year ago
cc. @yukkysaito @isamu-takagi
@TakaHoribe The mission_planner receives the goal pose and does arrival check with its own parameters. Since this parameter does not reflect the control parameter, I think the arrival check should be moved to a path planning or control module that knows the control parameter.
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
Checklist
Description
Even though the Planning module is still in the middle of the sequence, the goal decision is made by the
misiion_planner
with a large yaw angle error, and the state of Autoware is transited to STOP.Changing the goal threshold in the
mission_planner
can improve the behavior, but it will cause other issues like the goal decision will never be made due to poor control performance.The essential issue is that the goal decision is made without considering the status of the Planning and Control.
In the following picture, the planning is still making the trajectory to fix the yaw angle, but the goal decision is made and the Autoware will not move.
Expected behavior
The goal decision can appropriately consider the status of the planning process.
Actual behavior
Goal decision is made in the middle of the planning process.
Steps to reproduce
Versions
autoware.universe version: 2212b003ad5efb7f0baba221c976d0c8801ad236
Possible causes
No response
Additional context
No response