autowarefoundation / autoware_ai

Apache License 2.0
23 stars 8 forks source link

Release 1.10 #399

Closed esteve closed 5 years ago

esteve commented 5 years ago

Announcement

New Features

Improvements

Bug Fixes

Known Bugs

For Developers

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka I've created this ticket so that we can have a list of the planned changes for the 1.10 release and decide what should go in and what should be postponed as suggested by @shinpei0208 https://autoware-developer.slack.com/archives/C3C8XRV99/p1541114851079100

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

I'd like to also entry https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1551 and https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1693 once I can make them meaningful :)

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

New entry: https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/pull/1594

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

New entry: https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/pull/1645

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

New entry: https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1637

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

New enty: https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1701

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka I've added the tickets to the description

hakuturu583 commented 5 years ago

Sorry for my late. New entry autowarefoundation/autoware#1795

esteve commented 5 years ago

@hakuturu583 thanks for letting us know, but unfortunately it's too late for this release to include autowarefoundation/autoware#1795. The goal of this ticket is to list all the features and improvements that will go into a release before starting the release, not after. This helps us have a vision of what the priorities are for a given release/milestone and how efforts should be directed.

In any case, it looks like autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 is a good candidate for Autoware 1.11, we'll add it to the next release.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

Open source community should have a certain amount of discipline to work with a lot of people. I added a procedure into Contribution Rules to declare which version each issue is targeting. https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/wiki/Contribution-Rules#development-workflow

@hakuturu583 Sorry for the insufficient announcement. Also I'd like to encourage you to improve Autoware more and more. For that, let's talk what you are working on within the community :)

@esteve I've also talked with @hakuturu583. Though we can postpone autowarefoundation/autoware#1795, simulator is a very good tool for autonomous driving, and it's worth for Autoware and users. Since autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 does not affect the essential part of Autoware, we might be able to decide on importing autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 to test Autoware functions by challengers. How do you think in this case?

@hakuturu583 Any other comments?

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

Sorry, I have to withdraw autowarefoundation/autoware#1693 and autowarefoundation/autoware_ai#324.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka It was mostly because I think that we should be stating what we're going to work on for the current cycle, so we can anticipate and properly test everything before making a new release. That doesn't mean we can't squeeze in a new feature in the middle of the cycle, but they should have a rationale and give enough time to test it.

Unfortunately this wasn't the case with autowarefoundation/autoware#1795, it broke the build, doesn't have any tests at all and was merged in a rush.

autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 is a very valuable contribution and I'd really like it getting merged, but it'd be good to be a bit more disciplined with releases and plan a bit better, it'd help users anticipate any potentially incompatible changes before a release, for example.

hakuturu583 commented 5 years ago

@esteve autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 have already merged to develop, and travis CI said that the develop branch was not broken. Please show me the CI log.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@hakuturu583 we no longer use Travis for CI, and these are the tickets that report that the simulator bridge broke the build:

https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1802 https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1807

hakuturu583 commented 5 years ago

@esteve OK, I am fixing now.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@hakuturu583 no worries, it's really not big of a deal :-) I think the work you did in autowarefoundation/autoware#1795 is really valuable, but let's plan releases in advance so we can have more time to test them more thoroughly.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@hakuturu583 @esteve That'll make the process more workable :) I'd like to request not only contributers but reviewers to check the release plan of each pull request. I'll create the check list that reviewers reference.

Regarding this release 1.10, I'd like to provide autonomous driving to who has no real cars if it is not critical. Were the problems fixed or not? I found https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/pull/1808 was merged.

Finally, I apologize to @zelenkovsky and @hakuturu583. I knew they were working for the release 1.10. But I forgot to request to declare on the issue. https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/issues/1724#issuecomment-441248170

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@sgermanserrano @esteve Would you list pull requests that are better to be merged into v1.10? My understanding is:

sgermanserrano commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka @aohsato @cirpue49 as discussed in Slack #motion-planning channel A* is better used with costmap_generator than with points2costmap (which seems older -> can be deprecated and substituted by costmap_generator?). I'd suggest pushing [Feature] Improve Hybrid A* planner autowarefoundation/autoware#1594 from v1.10 to v1.11 to:

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@sgermanserrano I heard the discussion from @aohsato. Let's postpone to 1.11!

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka I postponed autowarefoundation/autoware#1704 because I thought it'd make it for the original 1.10 cutoff, but since it was delayed, I think we can try. I'll keep testing it locally, I'd appreciate your (and @sgermanserrano 's) feedback, since it will have a direct impact on the users.

autowarefoundation/autoware#1741 should be mergeable, but I need another +1.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

I've updated the status.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka I've added autowarefoundation/autoware#1704 to the list of tickets for this release and merged the PR.

esteve commented 5 years ago

Once autowarefoundation/autoware#1741 passes, I'll merge it as well.

sgermanserrano commented 5 years ago

@isamu-takagi @messi49 do autowarefoundation/autoware_ai#375 and autowarefoundation/autoware_ai#408 have associated PRs? or are they features on a planning/developing stage?

isamu-takagi commented 5 years ago

@sgermanserrano Sorry, Autoware Launcher is under development. I'll release it in v1.11.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@amc-nu @sgermanserrano @esteve How about creating release branch for v1.10 from HEAD of develop, merging autowarefoundation/autoware#1837 into the release branch, and staring test on the release branch?

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago
amc-nu commented 5 years ago

Hello @esteve @sgermanserrano and @kfunaoka

Please don't include autowarefoundation/autoware#1704 as it is in 1.10 I found the following problems:

  1. run script won't work, as it is. Please refer to https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/blob/develop/ros/run#L52
  2. Even after updating the script to install space. Since currently most of the packages do not include the install command for launch, and companion files. Only manual ros run commands will work, which are mostly not used by the UI and the current documentation. https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/blob/develop/ros/src/util/packages/runtime_manager/scripts/computing.yaml
  3. Compiling with catkin_make workflow is also broken, so it cannot be used as an alternative.

Fixing the above points will require a considerable amount of work. For this reason, I consider appropriate

  1. First to apply autowarefoundation/autoware_ai#389 , then
  2. Fix the file installation commands in the CMakeFiles and
  3. Finally include autowarefoundation/autoware#1704 + fixes in a release.

Otherwise, current users (ourselves included) will face a lot of problems. Please let me know your thoughts on this.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@amc-nu I've reverted autowarefoundation/autoware#1704 in https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/pull/1838, please have a look at it. However, the real problem is that for a long time the Autoware run script assumed that it was using the devel space, which is not a correct workflow in ROS. colcon is stricter about that, there's no devel space at all, only build and install, so if the packages are not properly written and they don't have an install target, they can't be used.

What I find strange is that catkin fails for you. Doesn't catkin_make_release work for you?

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

It seems all issues and problems are solved by some directions. I've created the release/1.10.0 branched from f77b7849273cffdbb5cc2583527c77d691572c45. Let me know if something should be done additionally.

Since we changed the build tool from catkin to calcon, we might need test time a little longer than usual. How about these target plan?

Version Merged Release
v1.10 Jan. 8th, 2018 (today) Jan. 17th, 2018

Also I'm thinking the docker image for test such as autoware/autoware:1.10.0-kinetic-rc1 will be useful.

esteve commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka looks good to me.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

I found the error autowarefoundation/autoware_ai#490. I'll check.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

I've uploaded autoware/autoware:1.10.0-kinetic-rc1 based on b21b663dc4e718e29de96f53efffb766d8af5ebe into dockerhub.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@esteve @sgermanserrano @amc-nu I've created the release note at the headline of this issue. Let me know if something should be added or modified. I'll release tomorrow.

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

@sgermanserrano Where can I look the latest code coverage report (#1654)?

sgermanserrano commented 5 years ago

@kfunaoka https://cpfl.gitlab.io/Autoware/

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

Thanks!

I've updated the wiki page for the new docker scripts. https://github.com/CPFL/Autoware/wiki/Generic-x86-Docker

bdholt1 commented 5 years ago

Congrats on the release! Can this issue be closed now?

kfunaoka commented 5 years ago

Thank you for reminding!