Open flagbug opened 11 years ago
So what would multiple releases look like?
## Title 1
Summary
**Section 1a
- Blah
- Blah2
**Another section 1b**
## Title 2
Summary
**Section 2a
- Blah
- Blah2
**Another section 2b**
Also are we agreeing to fail a document that has the presence of multiple heading types or would we say that what ever the lowest heading type that is present is the release one?
Unsure what you mean by would we say that what ever the lowest heading type that is present is the release one
.
I am leaning towards only one size of headers present in the document
I was thinking something like:
# Document Title
...
## Release 1
...
## Release 2
....
In this case it would see that multiple heading levels are used and ignore the "#" in favour for the lowest heading level (in this case "##").
I personally don't like this... I don't think its 100% clear.
Ah I get you.. Hrrm.
For my scenarios I can't see the need for having a document title inside the release notes. If you publish via jekyll or something the title will come from yaml front-matter and for ReleaseNotes.md the title is inferred from the filename.
I vote for a single header size within a document.
Good for me too, otherwise it's too confusing.
Great!
As the title says, I think there should be a way to tag a release with an (optional) release-date.