Open avellinwong01 opened 2 years ago
The manual testing is long because it shows expected outputs of invalid commands, or cases not specified in the UG since the UG focuses on valid inputs. As stated, the DG should compliment the UG which is why things like error messages for invalid inputs are focused on in the DG instead. Furthermore, since we have a lot of commands, the section is naturally longer. As such, we do not think there is a significant overlap between the UG and DG nor redudant information in the manual testing section.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: Don't think this is merely a cosmetic issue as this affects other developers in their testing of the product. I would say more of low severity.
The instructions for manual testing section take up ~50% of your DG length. I don't think it is necessary to have so much detail of all the different test cases, sample inputs and expected outputs -- it makes it overlap with the UG and there's way too much detail, making it overwhelming.