Closed brianorwhatever closed 2 years ago
I agree we can go with this way
There was a request from JFF to authenticate the DID that you are issuing to since you potentially are not talking to the same did.
"I want to avoid to issue credentials to a did:peer, so one can share another did when showing the VC"
closed as agreeement has been made. reopen if we want to reconsider
Proposal:
In the
offer-credential
message thedif/credential-manifest/manifest@v1.0
attachment contains apresentation_definition
within thecredential_manifest
, describing the proofchallenge
and proofdomain
for a DID Authentication VP.The following
request-credential
message has adif/credential-manifest/application@v1.0
attachment that is a VP which includes the previously mentionedchallenge
anddomain
in it's proof.