Rename repo to avi-lbaasv2

[anantpatil]

Can we rename this repo to avi-lbaasv2 instead?

[ypraveen]

How about simply avi-lbaas to indicate that it will work with lbaasv2 and octavia in future? or should we create avi-octavia separately?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:44 PM Anant Patil notifications@github.com wrote:

Can we rename this repo to avi-lbaasv2 instead?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/avinetworks/openstack-lbaasv2/issues/1, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD1HQT1TKQ3X8N9yomGMWIs0_55tMTXdks5vIT9XgaJpZM4aZjuI .

[grastogi23]

also, we need to update the juju cced CD

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:46 AM Praveen Yalagandula < notifications@github.com> wrote:

How about simply avi-lbaas to indicate that it will work with lbaasv2 and octavia in future? or should we create avi-octavia separately?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:44 PM Anant Patil notifications@github.com wrote:

Can we rename this repo to avi-lbaasv2 instead?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/avinetworks/openstack-lbaasv2/issues/1, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD1HQT1TKQ3X8N9yomGMWIs0_55tMTXdks5vIT9XgaJpZM4aZjuI

.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/avinetworks/openstack-lbaasv2/issues/1#issuecomment-458993330, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrBfzptgfwMdizyLmTAcDuXuHSMLz4Nks5vIb5ngaJpZM4aZjuI .

-- Gaurav Rastogi

grastogi AT avinetworks.com Avi Networks

[anantpatil]

@ypraveen Sure. We can host the Octavia driver here too.

[ypraveen]

On second thoughts, since "avinetworks" is already there in the path name, we shouldn't need to change this. For the package that gets created from this repo, we can name that avi-lbaasv2-driver or something akin to that.

Let's create a separate repo for Octavia driver, when we get that going.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:18 AM Anant Patil notifications@github.com wrote:

@ypraveen https://github.com/ypraveen Sure. We can host the Octavia driver here too.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/avinetworks/openstack-lbaasv2/issues/1#issuecomment-459006272, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD1HQQ8u35aAQF9ZLgwwC1aiVI_-qeGUks5vIcXxgaJpZM4aZjuI .

[anantpatil]

@ypraveen Usually the package name and repo name are same to avoid confusion, users typically search repo using the package name. IMO, better to avoid confusion let's have the repo name as avi-lbaas and package name also as avi-lbaas. We should include the octavia driver in this repo so that we don't have to manage code at multiple places, we can release, test and track issues on this repo for both LBaaSv2 and Octavia. The package will include both drivers, but with different namespace and driver name that can be configured in Neutron config or Octavia config.

[grastogi23]

I would suggest we don't deprecate the current package. We can still have the new repo but release two packages out of it. We can simply copy new package into old one so long as interfaces and modules don't change. This way anyone who has already done tooling around old package will continue to work and they can take their own time in migration.

thanks Gaurav

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:28 AM Anant Patil notifications@github.com wrote:

@ypraveen https://github.com/ypraveen Usually the package name and repo name are same to avoid confusion, users typically search repo using the package name. IMO, better to avoid confusion let's have the repo name as avi-lbaas and package name also as avi-lbaas. We should include the octavia driver in this repo so that we don't have to manage code at multiple places, we can release, test and track issues on this repo for both LBaaSv2 and Octavia. The package will include both drivers, but with different namespace and driver name that can be configured in Neutron config or Octavia config.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/avinetworks/openstack-lbaasv2/issues/1#issuecomment-460118312, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrBfwgjT0wASwIANqxiqIw2VRU40okjks5vJ6HHgaJpZM4aZjuI .

-- Gaurav Rastogi

grastogi AT avinetworks.com Avi Networks