Open avrs-admin opened 2 years ago
Joerg Wunsch
Well, it's really a poor idea from the to use such a common name like BAUD for a subregister. I wonder how much code needs to be reworked now ...
Sure, we could work around that by calling it BAUDRATE, and make BAUD an alias for it on controllers where it does not conflict.
Matt Wette
My proposed workaround is not correct because one still needs to compute the baud rate with respect to the F_CPU, so we still need a way to compute the register value.
Mon 25 Nov 2019 07:10:21 PM CET
Newer headers povided in the device packs from microchip include a struct for UARTS that defines a member "BAUD". This conflicts with the use of command line argument "-DBAUD-9600U". Use of this command line argument to avr-gcc results in compile error:
/opt/local/bin/avr-gcc -mmcu=atmega4809 -DF_CPU=3333333UL -Os -I.. -I../../ -B/opt/local/avr/packs/mega-1.3.300 -DBAUD=9600UL -c main.c -o main.o In file included from /opt/local/avr/include/avr/io.h:578, from main.c:3: