Open hsanzg opened 1 year ago
@hsanzg Can you try sn-o-w/cache-apt-pkgs-action@master
in your workflow to see if there is any difference? 🤔
I think I have found what could be wrong, but I'm not 100% sure if working correctly.
Hi @sn-o-w, could you take a look at @hsanzg and see if you can help? Would appreciate it.
@hsanzg do you still have the build log? Looks like it expired.
Sure! I've triggered a rebuild using sn-o-w's fork; the logs are available at https://github.com/hsanzg/diag-scals/actions/runs/8217644520/job/22473569925 (archive). I don't think they will be that useful, however, because the only error indication is the rather cryptic message tar: Cowardly refusing to create an empty archive
.
Sure! I've triggered a rebuild using sn-o-w's fork; the logs are available at https://github.com/hsanzg/diag-scals/actions/runs/8217644520/job/22473569925 (archive). I don't think they will be that useful, however, because the only error indication is the rather cryptic message
tar: Cowardly refusing to create an empty archive
.
Try again, but use awalsh128/cache-apt-pkgs-action@master
I'll just delete my repo, anyway.
That did the trick! Thank you for your help :)
Sad to say that this was a false positive: I'm still getting the tar
error message for packages intel-oneapi-mkl
and intel-oneapi-mkl-devel
(whereas it works fine for e.g. doxygen
). While the initial build passes (log archive), subsequent builds that use files supposedly cached by this action fail (log archive) because some of these files cannot be found; in particular, the Intel MKL environment setup script outputs the message "WARNING: No env scripts found: No "env/vars.sh" scripts to process." (Note that this message does not show up on the successful, no-package-cache build.)
Hello!
I recently set up a workflow to install and cache some APT packages before testing my project. Unfortunately once I introduced the
cache-apt-pkgs-action
step, the action fails with the following message:This occurs during the package caching step.
This seems like a duplicate of #76, but I'm using the
v1
tag of the action which supposedly includes the fix. Did I miss something?