[x] Software your are submitting is not your own, unless you have a healthy ecosystem with a few contributors (which aren't your sock puppet accounts).
[x] Submit one item per pull request. This eases reviewing and speeds up inclusion.
[x] Format your submission as follows, where Demo and Clients are optional.
Do not add a duplicate Source code link if it is the same as the main link.
Keep the short description under 80 characters and use sentence case
for it, even if the project's webpage or readme uses another capitalisation.
Demo links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations.
- [Name](http://homepage/) - Short description, under 250 characters, sentence case. ([Demo](http://url.to/demo), [Source Code](http://url.of/source/code), [Clients](https://url.to/list/of/related/clients-or-apps)) `License` `Language`
[x] Additions are inserted preserving alphabetical order.
[x] The Language tag is the main server-side requirement for the software. Don't include frameworks or specific dialects.
[x] You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
[x] Any category you are creating has the minimum requirement of 3 items.
[x] Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
[x] The pull request title is informative, unlike "Update README.md".
Suggested titles: "Add aaa to bbb" for adding software aaa to section bbb,
"Remove aaa from bbb" for removing, "Fix license for aaa", etc.
Please take some time to answer the following questions as best you can:
Why is it awesome?
Easy to set up idp, with self service support. In addition to the standard protocols (oAuth and SAML), outposts are available (Proxy, LDAP or RADIUS) for applications that are not natively SSO-capable.
Have you used it? For how long?
Over a year and a half
Is this in a personal or professional setup?
Personal
How many devices/users/services/... do you manage with it?
User < 20
Services 40
Biggest pros/cons compared to other solutions?
Pros:
Self service
Outposts (Proxy and LDAP)
Customization of the flows (login, user registration, ...)
MFA (OTP, SMS and WebAuth)
Cons:
With LDAP Source no write Back feature (User Changes not write to LDAP)
Any other comments about your use case, things you've found excellent, limitations you've encountered... ?
Currently using authentik for my private setup, but currently planning to use it for a corporate setup as well.
Thank you for taking the time to work on a PR for Awesome-Sysadmin!
To ensure your PR is dealt with swiftly please check the following:
Demo
andClients
are optional. Do not add a duplicateSource code
link if it is the same as the main link. Keep the short description under 80 characters and use sentence case for it, even if the project's webpage or readme uses another capitalisation.Demo
links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations.- [Name](http://homepage/) - Short description, under 250 characters, sentence case. ([Demo](http://url.to/demo), [Source Code](http://url.of/source/code), [Clients](https://url.to/list/of/related/clients-or-apps)) `License` `Language`
Language
tag is the main server-side requirement for the software. Don't include frameworks or specific dialects.Please take some time to answer the following questions as best you can:
Easy to set up idp, with self service support. In addition to the standard protocols (oAuth and SAML), outposts are available (Proxy, LDAP or RADIUS) for applications that are not natively SSO-capable.
Over a year and a half
Personal
User < 20 Services 40
Pros:
Cons:
With LDAP Source no write Back feature (User Changes not write to LDAP)
Any other comments about your use case, things you've found excellent, limitations you've encountered... ?
Currently using authentik for my private setup, but currently planning to use it for a corporate setup as well.