I just noticed a code review which suggested against the name
we are currently using and gave some good reasoning:
"Naming things "new" is always a problem (since time passes and
it's no longer new). Maybe colonize_symbol_keys? ("colonize"
sounds kind of gross though...)
https://git.io/vKIiX
The ruby19_syntax name was suggested later in the conversation.
As we have not yet released with the previous option name, it's
now or never for this change.
@waldyr: @alexch and @imajes raised some good points about the naming of the
new_hash_syntax
option (https://github.com/awesome-print/awesome_print/pull/193/commits/188becfadfbff3b5fd952e0366bf36c8c6f59b59#r26746035). I only just spotted these comments and I think they raise good points. So I proposeruby19_syntax
as the symbol name. Glad I spotted this before we released.Commit message:
I just noticed a code review which suggested against the name we are currently using and gave some good reasoning:
"Naming things "new" is always a problem (since time passes and it's no longer new). Maybe colonize_symbol_keys? ("colonize" sounds kind of gross though...) https://git.io/vKIiX
The ruby19_syntax name was suggested later in the conversation.
As we have not yet released with the previous option name, it's now or never for this change.