Closed shurco closed 7 months ago
I shall mark this as on hold until 1.0.0 is reached, thank you for your contribution!
I shall mark this as on hold until 1.0.0 is reached, thank you for your contribution!
Sign of double standards! For example:
In the "Software Development - Low Code" section you have the PocketBase project. It has the same conditions, but it is present in the catalog despite the fact that it is in active development like my project.
https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted/pull/3588
Pocketbase was added last year before we became stricter with quality control / before we added the release rule.
Pocketbase was added last year before we became stricter with quality control / before we added the release rule.
If the rules have changed, Pocketbase needs to be deleted!!! What prevents the developer from removing this warning, getting approval and adding this warning again? ))
I say it should be fine to add this, we had the same case in https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted-data/pull/558. At least the warning is present and the project is up front about it. There is nothing in the guidelines that prevents the addition of a pre-1.0.0 project. The only thing that's required is an initial release older than 4 months.
However @shurco would you say that this project is "production-ready"? What exactly is missing for it to reach v1.0.0 and/or stabilize the release cycle?
My bad for my wrong perception of this Issue then, as we did it before, and since they are upfront, you are right @nodiscc, this will be right for the list.
Do I need to do anything else, or just wait for your decision?
Think that's it as he has removed the feedback needed / reviewers wanted tag, I've created a PR to fulfill the request. Thank you :)
Thanks for taking the time to suggest an addition to awesome-selfhosted!
Please fill out information below (all fields are mandatory unless noted otherwise):
To ensure your issue is dealt with swiftly, please check the following (check the boxes
[x]
):