aws-powertools / powertools-lambda-dotnet

Powertools is a developer toolkit to implement Serverless best practices and increase developer velocity.
https://docs.powertools.aws.dev/lambda/dotnet/
MIT No Attribution
152 stars 24 forks source link

docs: add link to Powertools for AWS Lambda workshop #581

Closed dreamorosi closed 4 months ago

dreamorosi commented 4 months ago

Please provide the issue number

Issue number: #580

Summary

Changes

Please provide a summary of what's being changed

This PR adds a link to the Powertools for AWS Lambda workshop in the documentation sidebar. This will allow customers to know about the existence of the workshop.

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

image

Note: the screenshot is from the TypeScript docs, however it'll look the same in yours

Checklist

Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.

Is this a breaking change? **RFC issue number**: Checklist: * [ ] Migration process documented * [ ] Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

boring-cyborg[bot] commented 4 months ago

Thanks a lot for your first contribution! Please check out our contributing guidelines and don't hesitate to ask whatever you need. In the meantime, check out the #dotnet channel on our Powertools for AWS Lambda Discord: Invite link

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codecov-commenter commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 72.91%. Comparing base (ff53f97) to head (b1f53c5).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #581 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 72.95% 72.91% -0.05% =========================================== Files 109 109 Lines 4489 4489 Branches 455 455 =========================================== - Hits 3275 3273 -2 - Misses 1085 1087 +2 Partials 129 129 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-dotnet/pull/581/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-dotnet/pull/581/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools) | `72.91% <ø> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

boring-cyborg[bot] commented 4 months ago

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request and thank you for helping improve everyone's experience!