chore: Update idempotency examples for release 1..10.0

hjgraca commented 4 months ago

Please provide the issue number

Issue number: #585

Summary

Changes

Update Idempotency examples for new release

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.

[x] Meets tenets criteria
[x] I have performed a self-review of this change
[x] Changes have been tested
[ ] Changes are documented
[x] PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

**RFC issue number**: Checklist: * [ ] Migration process documented * [ ] Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 72.20%. Comparing base (7a10387) to head (e07c64d). Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #589 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 72.59% 72.20% -0.40% =========================================== Files 190 190 Lines 7901 7901 Branches 851 851 =========================================== - Hits 5736 5705 -31 - Misses 1874 1898 +24 - Partials 291 298 +7 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-dotnet/pull/589/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-dotnet/pull/589/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools) | `72.20% <ø> (-0.40%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aws-powertools#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

aws-powertools / powertools-lambda-dotnet