Closed shaileshgupta2k closed 2 years ago
The walkthrough does use IRSA. It needs an update to use a more refined policy rather than full access, but the step is clearly documented and should work as you indicate.
I just ran through the steps and indeed it works as expected. Can you reproduce this? Was any failure observed in creating the service account? If not, logs from the controller deployment may be helpful.
I am having the exact same issue/ Resources gRPC config stream closed: 16, Missing Authentication Token. However, this issue cropped up after I had done clean up(following the steps) and then tried to recreate the dj-app mesh.
I am still unable to reproduce this taking only the steps in the workshop module. I am struggling to understand the problem described here, as we should not require proxy authorization for this demo. That said, I have filed a PR to add proxy auth, since we'll eventually need it in the future. For now, it should only be required for Virtual Gateways and if using TLS.
If someone can reproduce this following the explicit steps in the module, please see the updated version which will also apply proxy auth for the proxies running in the app namespace. I'd like to know if it resolves the problem.
Hi,
One of the AppMesh's customer and I have been trying to implement the djapp K8s examples with AppMesh and have been running into issues. The Pod's sidecar envoy fails the readiness probe due to unavailability of any credentials for the Envoy to Talk to AppMesh's Envoy Management Service. Though Envoy is supposed to use IRSA, but Envoy is made to fallback to instance metadata credentials.
Below are the error seen in Envoy logs:
From the Error code of 16, it means that
The Envoy proxy does not have valid authentication credentials for AWS.
Also, when we restart the deployment for the [AppMesh sidecar injection](kubectl -n prod rollout restart deployment dj jazz-v1 metal-v1 ) into the PODS, the old pods stay live along with the new pods, for example:
Please take a look into the issue and let me know if further data is required or not. I think the way AppMesh is being injected into the Pods is taking a hit somewhere.