I would like to implement AppConfig L2 Construct. It has already got enough votes (see, https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/6831). Also, I believe that CDK, which is more application-oriented than CFn, will be able to manage AppConfig well, which will create a variety of value.
[ ] Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
[ ] API signed-off (label api-approved applied to pull request)
[ ] Final comments period (label: status/final-comments-period)
[ ] Approved and merged (label: status/approved)
[ ] Execution plan submitted (label: status/planning)
[ ] Plan approved and merged (label: status/implementing)
[ ] Implementation complete (label: status/done)
Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.
Description
I would like to implement AppConfig L2 Construct. It has already got enough votes (see, https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/6831). Also, I believe that CDK, which is more application-oriented than CFn, will be able to manage AppConfig well, which will create a variety of value.
Roles
Workflow
status/proposed
)status/review
)api-approved
applied to pull request)status/final-comments-period
)status/approved
)status/planning
)status/implementing
)status/done
)