Open HassanMahmud opened 4 years ago
Hey there. Looks like this is a known issue with cloudformation. They have an issue in their roadmap for it.
We can potentially perform some logic inside of the construct to pass undefined
to the L1 when the user passes false
to cover this from our side. I can't imagine that causing any conflicts in the future. @eladb opinions on diverging from CFN here to prevent this error? Should be non-breaking as far as I can tell.
That is exactly what you're workaround is doing but one level higher. Anyone else encountering this can do that as well in the meantime.
I've just bumped into this issue as well.
It would make a lot of sense to reflect this in the docs.
Currently docs for interface QueueProps reads: fifo? | boolean
.
Would be better to make it some enum like true
or undefined
.
experience same
bump - also ran into this issue
bump - same issue, in python 3.7 using:
self._queue=sqs.Queue(
scope,
QUEUE_ID_PREFIX + name,
fifo=True if FIFO_ENABLED else None,
removal_policy=REMOVAL_POLICY
)
fixed this for me.
same, Python 3.9
Had the same issue, python 3.9, still unclear that it needs None
Seeing this as well in typescript.
Seeing this as well. The documentation is literally incorrect in claiming that FifoQueue is boolean.
Same issue when contentBasedDeduplication=false
.
Just encountered this in CDK v2 using Typescript. Agree with comments elsewhere in the thread - update docs and/or make this an enum of true | undefined
. Minor issue but easily fixed.
Also ran into this in CDK v2 Typescript. Not exactly the same issue since my FifoQueue is currently always false
, but I just removed the property altogether and it solved my issue.
Hello. Saw the same issue here and yeah removing the property helps, but still confusing
This issue has received a significant amount of attention so we are automatically upgrading its priority. A member of the community will see the re-prioritization and provide an update on the issue.
It appears this issue has moved to Coming Soon
on the CloudFormation roadmap. We should continue to wait for CloudFormation to push this as it appears the wait will not be much longer
Workaround in Typescript CDK
const additionalProperties = props.fifo
? {
fifo: true,
}
: {};
queue = new aws_sqs.Queue(this, `SomeQueue`, {
queueName: name,
...additionalProperties
})
Any movement on this?
Bump, same issue. Fixed using @ParallelPlatypus's method (thank you!)
fifo=True if fifo_enabled==True else None
Bump, had to remove the property fifo
as it was set to false
. Can we get an ETA when this is resolved in CDK?
This is still an issue.
imo it should not accept undefined at all, but I guess now that people are required to use it it should be marked as deprecated and only accept true/false after few versions.
I've just bumped into this issue as well.
It would make a lot of sense to reflect this in the docs. Currently docs for interface QueueProps reads:
fifo? | boolean
. Would be better to make it some enum liketrue
orundefined
.
or even better: make it work like other constructs by allowing only boolean values and adjust documentation accordingly.
in the meantime I added function that i can call to hide the inconsistency.
function fixCDKBooleanLogic(isValueTrue: boolean): boolean | undefined { if (isValueTrue) { return true; } else { return undefined; } }
and calling it from sqs construct, where props.fifotype is boolean value.
new sqs.Queue(this, fine-sqs-queue
, {
fifo: fixCDKBooleanLogic(props.fifotype),
...
}
Setting fifo to false in QueueProps when creating an SQS queue causes the deploy to fail.
Reproduction Steps
This is the code used to create the queue. It is part of a reusable component, I have made a workaround of only setting the fifo prop if it is set to true and everything works as expected.
Error Log
This error shows up under CloudFormation events as the reason why creating the queue failed. Unknown Attribute FifoQueue. (Service: AmazonSQS; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidAttributeName; Request ID:)
Environment
Other
I found a similar issue report here: AWS PHP SDK Github issue
This is :bug: Bug Report