Closed vdharashive closed 1 month ago
https://github.com/jambonz/freeswitch-modules/tree/main/mod_aws_transcribe
is code implementation
@davehorton
We are currently looking into this.
We added an additional configuration to help avoid cpu spikes when using transcribe. Please update to the latest version of this sdk and let us know if you have any other questions/concerns when using this sdk.
@jmklix will test and let you know thank you very much
@jmklix having LOW_LATENCY and REGULAR is not ideal solution , since for real-time transcript with REGUALR does not respond quick enough and gets stuck, with LOW_LATENCY cpu usage goes very high. i don't think is right way to address the issue
does using websocket api will solve this problem ?
Can you elaborate on what you exactly mean with "REGUALR does not respond quick enough and gets stuck"? How quickly are you expecting this sdk to respond?
What are your thoughts/suggestions on the correct way to fix this issue? How would you have websocket api to improve this?
Greetings! It looks like this issue hasn’t been active in longer than a week. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release. Because it has been longer than a week since the last update on this, and in the absence of more information, we will be closing this issue soon. If you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or add an upvote to prevent automatic closure, or if the issue is already closed, please feel free to open a new one.
Describe the bug
Reported issue in below thread is not resolved
https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-cpp/issues/2779
Expected Behavior
Performance issue with asr aws transcribe
Current Behavior
CPU usage for each connection goes avg 80%
Reproduction Steps
yes its reproducible
Possible Solution
No response
Additional Information/Context
No response
AWS CPP SDK version used
1.11.283
Compiler and Version used
gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
Operating System and version
Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)