Open UlysseDurand opened 3 months ago
Please tell me exactly which version of CVC5 you are running, and I will try to reproduce results here. Earlier versions of CVC5 were worse than CVC4, particularly in Bit-Vector reasoning. This was acknowledged by Andrew R, Clark and the other CVC5 developers some time ago, but I was waiting for it to get fixed before committing to the switch.
My version of CVC5 is 1.0.5, it completed all the proofs on my side but I understand it might be less efficient on some operations.
I am building CVC5 1.1.2 here on macOS to see what I get. I will post results soon.
OK... with Z3 4.12.5, CVC5 1.1.2 and AltErgo 2.4.0, all proofs are OK with no change to the sources at all.
With CVC5 1.1.2 ALONE, I see 29 undischarged VCs, so still room for improvement there...
With CVC4 1.8 ALONE, I get 21 undischarged VCs, so CVC5 is still worse in some areas...
@rod-chapman don't you want to upgrade to cvc5 in that case? CVC4 is not maintained, and bugs could be present, with no guarantee that they would be fixed.
As of now, I am happy to upgrade, since CVC5+Z3+AltErgo is equal in performance to CVC4+Z3+AltErgo. In the long run, I want CVC5 to prove the whole library on its own. To that end, I am trying to submit the LibMLKEM SMT files as a benchmark for future runs of SMT-Comp.
This makes reference to the issue https://github.com/awslabs/LibMLKEM/issues/1.
I made gnatprove use cvc5 and added one Assert to make it prove everything (with my computer, cvc5 failed to prove the assertion line 1614).
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.