Open darkcrawler01 opened 8 years ago
You're correct that the KCL really doesn't support heterogeneous fleets.
We agree with the change you have suggested, and will prioritize it accordingly against the other customer requests we receive.
Others - Please comment or add your reaction to this post so our team is aware of how to prioritize this change.
This would be helpful, especially if the weighting were automatic. E.G., a worker unable to keep up on 2 shards wouldn't steal leases from a worker staying caught up on 10. (For me, this is an issue with deploying workers as services in an ECS cluster running multiple different services with uneven container distribution; some workers are consistently able to burst above their CPU reservations on certain hosts).
any progress or workaround this feature?
any progress on this feature request?
We are using KCL 1.9.1 with autoscaling groups, and would really like to use a mix of instance types. Right now we are restricted to use instance types with same core and memory configuration. It would be great if this can be supported with 1.x versions as well.
I am investigating if its possible to diversify the ec2 InstanceType of the instances running the KCL workers to take advantage of the EC2 Spot Market, that would require simultaneously running KCL on instances with different cores/memory. As far as I can see KCL uniformly distributes the shards across all active workers. There is currently no way to specify a weight to be associated with each worker. Workers could specify a weight
W
between 1-10 which would mean that worker withW10
should be assigned10x
more shards than Worker withW1
. Is this the proper way to handling this problem ? Or is there any other alternative solution like using dockers to homogenize the heterogeneous compute pools ?