Closed massi-ang closed 1 year ago
As the browser and the node library have different features/functionalities, it is impossible to make them the same. There will always be some gap between the two APIs. However, we will try our best to unify them. We've added the task on our road map. Thank you to bring this up!
For the intellisense issue, one solution is to explicitly import the specific library, in case I know that the code is for the browser or node respectively. Eg:
import { mqtt, iot } from "aws-crt/dist.browser/browser";
provides the right intellisense suggestions.
Thank you for sharing the intellisense solution!
Hi @massi-ang, after reviewing the difference in the APIs. We figured there some missing API we can fix. As an example: new_websocket_builder was missing in browser library. Other than that, there is little we can do because of the difference behind browser and node connection. Is there any specific interface you would like us to improve? Let me know if you have any suggestions.
Hi, I understand that the native implementation supports some configurations that are not available in the browser implementation, but the common subset of the methods between the two implementations should have the same signatures.
The main difference between Node library and Browser library is the way they setup the websocket. To satisfied the async design on browser side, we have to change how the websocket setup, which causes the API difference.
Besides the websocket configurations, there is also some mismatch on parameters. For example, with_socket_options
will take different SocketOptions as they are implemented differently on Node side and browser side. We do not have a way to unify them for now.
As for now, we will add new_builder_for_websocket
for API compatibility with the native version.
Here is a table of the current mismatched APIs:
Node | Browser | Status | Note |
---|---|---|---|
new_mtls_builder_from_path | -- | Invalid | Browser not support |
new_websocket_builder | new_builder_for_websocket | Mismatch | This function in Native directly calls new_with_websockets. |
new_mtls_windows_cert_store_path_builder | -- | Invalid | Browser not support |
new_mtls_pkcs11_builder | -- | Invalid | Browser not support |
with_certificate_authority_from_path | -- | Invalid | Browser not support |
with_certificate_authority | -- | Invalid | Browser not support |
with_protocol_operation_timeout_ms | -- | Invalid | Browser not support (Mqtt.js does not have a operation timeout settings for mqtt3) |
with_will | with_will | Different parameters | |
with_socket_options | with_socket_options | Different parameters | |
-- | with_websocket_headers | Invalid | The Node library implement the websocket configs in a different way. |
-- | with_credential_provider | Invalid | The Node library implements the credential provider in a different way. |
Thank you.
Closing issue here. Feel free to reopen it if you have further consideration related to the API.
The
iot.AwsIotMqttConnectionConfigBuilder
module has 2 different APIs depending if used with the browser or with node. This does not allow me to write code that works the same in both environments and does not play well with VS Code intellisense/autocompletion which select the node version.While implementation should differ depending , the APIs should be the same.