Closed yunjeongmun closed 3 months ago
Hi SeongJae,
This is related to #99 to support target_nid
. Please have a look. Thanks!
Thank you for kindly double checking my humble comments. Nonetheless, I found this PR makes unit tests fail. I was lucky to find the root cause relatively easy, so just fixed it by myself: https://github.com/awslabs/damo/commit/79d0d69896815087e801b18e789d7b12edc10a83
Anyway, pushed this PR together with the fix. Thank you again for your great contribution!
Thanks for the review. We didn't know about the unittest, but it'd be helpful if you could tell us how to run the unittest.
In addition, we might be better to consider adding a GitHub action that runs the unittest automatically so that we can check the status before merging PRs.
how to run the unittest.
You can run it by
$ ./tests/unit/test.sh
Also, it runs as part of the damo
testing: https://github.com/awslabs/damo/blob/next/CONTRIBUTING#L29
I now realize the document is suggesting running it for only finding issues. It would better to be encouraged to run for every PR if possible. I will try to update the document for that.
we might be better to consider adding a GitHub action that runs the unittest
I have no strong opinion here, mainly because damo
maintenance overhead is not that big for now.
I'm so glad to contribute this project! Thanks for reviewing and fixing the bug :)
how to run the unittest.
You can run it by
$ ./tests/unit/test.sh
Thanks. I found that the test fails as you explained without having your fix.
$ ./tests/unit/test.sh
PASS unit test_damo_records.py
PASS unit test_damo_scheme_dbgfs_conversion.py
FAIL unit test_damo_schemes_input.py
Also, it runs as part of the
damo
testing: https://github.com/awslabs/damo/blob/next/CONTRIBUTING#L29
Sorry, I didn't read it carefully.
I now realize the document is suggesting running it for only finding issues. It would better to be encouraged to run for every PR if possible. I will try to update the document for that.
we might be better to consider adding a GitHub action that runs the unittest
I have no strong opinion here, mainly because
damo
maintenance overhead is not that big for now.
I will think about it when I can find some time for this extra work.
we might be better to consider adding a GitHub action that runs the unittest
I have no strong opinion here, mainly because
damo
maintenance overhead is not that big for now.
I have made automatic unit test run setup whenever making a commit using pre-commit. Please see #102.
This pull request includes 2 patches that support 'target_nid' for 'migrate_hot' and 'migrate_cold' actions.
The first patch adds 'target_nid' under scheme to represent the migration target node ID for new DAMOS actions, migrate_hot and migrate_cold, have been introduced. The second patch extends the '--damos_action' to ensure that the node number follows when the action is 'migration_hot' or 'migration_cold'. The usage is as follows:
The other non migrate actions do not require the extra argument as is.