Closed mgeisler closed 3 months ago
Since the method can also be used to commit received proposals (if/when we support them), the current name might be better?
The changes in the tests show this a bit, but I'll let people here discuss :smile:
I'm not so sure about this one...
Without having looked into this much, a side note is that we should avoid non standard terminology as much as possible.
Thanks for the feedback! Let me close this for now since it doesn't sound like a good idea.
Issues:
Addresses #81.
Description of changes:
When discussing this internally, the feeling was that
commit
would mostly be used to refresh keys. The namekey_update
would thus be more descriptive.Call-outs:
Since the method can also be used to commit received proposals (if/when we support them), the current name might be better?
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT license.