Closed ShaneTian closed 2 years ago
Thanks for your outstanding work!
In the End2End evaluation, the PPTOD-large is worse than PPTOD-small and PPTOD-base on both full-training (Table 2) and few-shot (Table 3) versions.
To a certain extent, this result is contrary to common sense. Is there any possible reason or experimental discovery?
Hi,
Many thanks for your interest in our work!
For the PPTOD-large's performance in E2E modelling, we provide some analysis in our ACL camera-ready version which is available here (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.14739.pdf). Please find our analysis in section 4.1.3.
Please let me know if you have further questions :-)
Thanks for your outstanding work!
In the End2End evaluation, the PPTOD-large is worse than PPTOD-small and PPTOD-base on both full-training (Table 2) and few-shot (Table 3) versions.
To a certain extent, this result is contrary to common sense. Is there any possible reason or experimental discovery?