[x] Please have "National Police Index" header bring you back home
[x] Birth year decimals:
Florida has a birth year decimal
Kentucky has a birth year decimal
Ohio has a birth year decimal
[x] Tennessee "reason for separation" should be "employment change"
[x] Utah "reason for separation" should be "employment status"
[x] Vermont "reason for separation" should be "employment change"
[x] Wyoming "reason for separation" should be "employment status"
Holding for launch:
[x] New Mexico
On further review, I think we should keep Maryland. It's ok that it might show multiple rows within the same department for an officer and that it's a little inconsistent with the other states. It's still useful and accurate.
Maira's list:
Map
Explanatory copy of why we’re doing this & that it is legal and necessary on the site
Make sure it’s a consistent font & colors with CPDP (and that the font is the same everywhere, not just title)
[x] Please capitalize data
[ ] Please order columns:
UID
First name
Last name
If demographic info exists
Start/end dates
Employers
Reason for separation if exists
[x] Please add to dropdown:
Georgia Discipline
Oregon
South Carolina
Idaho
[x] Please have "National Police Index" header bring you back home
[x] Birth year decimals:
Florida has a birth year decimal
Kentucky has a birth year decimal
Ohio has a birth year decimal
[x] Tennessee "reason for separation" should be "employment change"
[x] Utah "reason for separation" should be "employment status"
[x] Vermont "reason for separation" should be "employment change"
[x] Wyoming "reason for separation" should be "employment status"
Holding for launch:
On further review, I think we should keep Maryland. It's ok that it might show multiple rows within the same department for an officer and that it's a little inconsistent with the other states. It's still useful and accurate.
Maira's list: