Feature: (sort-objects) option for destructuring only

[jl-compileit]

What rule do you want to change?

sort-objects

Describe the problem

We have too many objects that we don't want sorted (e.g. XState machines where properties are grouped logically) to make sort-objects with ignore-pattern and/or ESLint overrides feasible. It would be nice to still have object destructuring available, particularly for React components where currently the props' type get sorted but the prop destructuring does not.

Code example

Input:

const data = {
  software: 'iOS',
  name: 'iPhone 14 Pro',
};
function Product({ software, name }) { ... }

Expected output:

const data = {
  software: 'iOS',
  name: 'iPhone 14 Pro',
};
function Product({ name, software }) { ... }

Additional comments

Not sure if it should be an option to sort-objects or a new/split rule. https://github.com/mskelton/eslint-plugin-sort has separate rules for destructuring-properties and object-properties.

Validations

• [X] Read the docs.
• [X] Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.

[KID-joker]

"perfectionist/sort-objects": [
      "error",
      {
        "ignore-pattern": ["data"]
      }
]

Does ignore-pattern solve your problem?

[jl-compileit]

Does ignore-pattern solve your problem?

Unfortunately not; as I said we have many objects in many different places with many different names/no names that we don't want sorted.

[KID-joker]

Okay, I know. How about ignore-pattern supports Function to customize?

[jl-compileit]

Okay, I know. How about ignore-pattern supports Function to customize?

Sure, as long as the function receives enough information to differentiate between "regular" objects and destructuring, regardless of what names they may have or the files they're in. A tiny example of things we want to ignore: https://github.com/statelyai/xstate/blob/main/examples/fetch/src/fetchMachine.ts

[KID-joker]

Okay, I know. How about ignore-pattern supports Function to customize?

@azat-io What do you think of this solution?