Closed sogladev closed 4 days ago
I would prefer a solution similiar to #17442 if possible
E.g. adding
AURA_INTERRUPT_FLAG_TALK
Maybe?
ah i only now saw that you already referenced that flag in the PR description. so yeah, those spells are probably just missing this flag?
ah i only now saw that you already referenced that flag in the PR description. so yeah, those spells are probably just missing this flag?
I overlooked SpellInfoCorrections :smile: adding the flag worked
Thanks for the update :) the title might also need an update as it's not related to scripts anymore
Core/Spells
updated title and description
Changes Proposed:
This PR proposes changes to:
the visual channeled spells are interrupted by gossip, however the aura associated with spinning and adding the xp buff is not
https://github.com/azerothcore/azerothcore-wotlk/blob/fd87ce1bf39b4b44c77734bcc7f6c1f22000d7b3/src/server/game/Handlers/NPCHandler.cpp#L293
https://github.com/azerothcore/azerothcore-wotlk/assets/46423958/5bd03eef-fc27-458e-bbb0-dbf170d1c7d5
changes: add AURA_INTERRUPT_FLAG_TALK to spin aura
Issues Addressed:
SOURCE:
The changes have been validated through:
Tests Performed:
This PR has been:
How to Test the Changes:
1. 2. 3.
Known Issues and TODO List:
How to Test AzerothCore PRs
When a PR is ready to be tested, it will be marked as [WAITING TO BE TESTED].
You can help by testing PRs and writing your feedback here on the PR's page on GitHub. Follow the instructions here:
http://www.azerothcore.org/wiki/How-to-test-a-PR
REMEMBER: when testing a PR that changes something generic (i.e. a part of code that handles more than one specific thing), the tester should not only check that the PR does its job (e.g. fixing spell XXX) but especially check that the PR does not cause any regression (i.e. introducing new bugs).
For example: if a PR fixes spell X by changing a part of code that handles spells X, Y, and Z, we should not only test X, but we should test Y and Z as well.