Feat/Fix: Dynamic creature levels, reworked reward scaling, many fixes and improvements

[kjack9]

This (large) PR adds multiple new features to mod-autobalance.

• Creature levels may be scaled in "fixed" or "dynamic" mode.
  • "fixed" mode sets the level of all creatures to the highest player's level (v2 behavior)
  • "dynamic" mode sets the level of creatures based on the highest player's level and the relative original levels of the creatures
  • "dynamic" level ceiling and floor can be set per instance type or instance ID
• Reward (XP/Gold) Scaling may be scaled in "fixed" or "dynamic" mode
  • "fixed" mode divides rewards by the max number of players in the dungeon (v2 behavior)
  • "dynamic" mode varies the rewards based on the health/damage multipliers as well as level scaling
• Greatly improve behavior after a .reload config to dynamically update creatures as configured
• Scale health and damage per-expansion based on the level of the player, not the creature. Gradually transition between expansions.
• Optionally use distance from players to ensure that only the current wing is tracked for creatures (Scarlet Monastery)
• Add lots of new data to .ab creaturestat and .ab mapstat
• Make several read-only commands available to all players, not just GMs.
• Include lots of debug logging that can be enabled to troubleshoot the module's operation

I propose that this PR updates the module version to v2.2.0, but it does have several variables that are deprecated or outright removed. I have supported the old variable names where it is practical, but there are changes in functionality that may create different results from before. I am open to calling this v3.0 is that is deemed more appropriate.

Looking forward to your testing and questions.

[Helias]

I did not work on this module so I can't make a full review of the code, the PR looks good to me, but I would wait some other reviewers

[pangolp]

Particularly, I work with smaller PR. However, in some cases I understand that it is not possible. Because I haven't worked in the module enough. To understand the difference, between the current and the change you propose. Beyond the explanation found in the PR, which is fine I think. Helias, considers that it is fine, and I think so too. But neither of us, we have worked enough... We could approve it, and in any case, reverse it. But if you can explain to me the difference, maybe it would be better.

[kjack9]

Particularly, I work with smaller PR. However, in some cases I understand that it is not possible. Because I haven't worked in the module enough. To understand the difference, between the current and the change you propose. Beyond the explanation found in the PR, which is fine I think. Helias, considers that it is fine, and I think so too. But neither of us, we have worked enough... We could approve it, and in any case, reverse it. But if you can explain to me the difference, maybe it would be better.

We discussed on Discord and I believe @pangolp has what they need now. Let me know if that's not the case.

[pangolp]

Thanks for the PR.