Open kdiverson opened 11 years ago
@kdiverson I'm noticing that this issue is still open, I guess I forgot what you told me about the issue. Was this fixed? If not can you give me a little bit recap of it, what's the exact issue and what you'd like an example output to look like?
I think this was for showing feature importance per class. Example from R:
head(ent.rf$importance)
Partition_1 Partition_2 Partition_3 MeanDecreaseAccuracy MeanDecreaseGini
Otu02439 0 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000000
Otu02449 0 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.005566667
Otu02509 0 2.666667e-05 0.000000e+00 8.771930e-06 0.035270498
Otu02510 0 0.000000e+00 -2.469136e-05 -9.345794e-06 0.113034105
Otu02512 0 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.002666667
Otu02513 0 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.020639278
The output summary file doesn't divide up the features by class.
example output from multi-class design file: