[FEAT]: Ability to map NFS mounts in Market Installs/ServApps

[Lockszmith-GH]

Feature Description

Baiscally, a UI implementation to define the following docker-compose equivalent config:

volumes:
  example:
    driver_opts:
      type: "nfs"
      o: "addr=10.40.0.199,nolock,soft,rw"
      device: ":/docker/example"

https://stackoverflow.com/a/46481637/799379

[azukaar]

I have long term plan for the volume side of thing (mounting any kind of network storage like Drive, Dropbox, etc...) so this wont probably be needed as is

[Lockszmith-GH]

That sounds great. But here we're talking about supporting exisitng implementation.

I'm running Cosmos as a VM on a TrueNAS SCALE, the best way to connect to the NAS shares is using NFS mounts.

Will using a predefined volume, one created with docker volumes from the command line work? I'll try and report here if it doesn't

[azukaar]

Not from the UI but you can support it by simply using the snipet you linked earlier with the compose import tool

[Lockszmith-GH]

Just wanted to update that indeed, using volumes defined externally, are selectable via the volumes drop down (although is not sorted).

So until such a feature exists, I manage these volumes in a docker compose separate from cosmos.

Something like this docker-compose.yml (click to expand)

```yaml version: "3.7" services: shell: image: bash:latest restart: "no" container_name: arr-bash command: -c 'echo "network and volumes are setup."' volumes: - apps-nfs-remote:/data/nfs-remote - local-other:/data/local-other networks: - a-network networks: a-network: name: a-network volumes: apps-nfs-remote: name: apps-nfs-remote driver: local driver_opts: type: "nfs" o: "addr=example.local,nolock,soft,rw" device: ":/path/to/nfs/export" local-other: name: local-other driver: local driver_opts: type: "none" o: "bind" device: "./path/to/other/" ```

This allows me to docker compose up to apply changes, and if some maintenance is required, I can remove all of that with docker compose down --volumes.

As long as I don't define actual docker volumes in that file, there is no data-loss.

Let me know if you need me to open a separate feature request for the sorting of the volumes picker.

[azukaar]

volume picker needs a makeover with search integrated and so on, it kinda sucks right now :/