Note: this is a problem, a missing feature. Not a bug.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. evaluate expression involving record #recdef{}.
2. {{undefined_record,recdef},[{erl_eval,exprs,2}]}}
What is the expected output?
Well, that is the expected output. I just thought that it would be very
nice to have record support here just as in the shell.
What would it take to add it? First a way to define/load record definitions
just as with rd/rr in the shell. (I don't understand enough of the shells
src to even attempt to rip it from there).
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
4.0 Linux
Original issue reported on code.google.com by heinz.er...@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2009 at 3:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
heinz.er...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2009 at 3:37