Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Good point. I'll sure investigate it. Did you checked the assembler output ?
Original comment by yann.col...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2012 at 12:54
Yes, with Visual Studio the original code was:
mov al, [xxx]
movzx ??, al
while with my proposed change:
movzx ??,byte ptr [xxx]
Original comment by strig...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2012 at 1:08
Enhancement request.
Original comment by yann.col...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2012 at 1:33
Confirmed decompression speed gain of 2.5%, using VS2008 on a Core i5 with
Windows 7 64bits. Quite impressive for such a small change.
Also, successfully pass non-regression tests.
Original comment by yann.col...@gmail.com
on 7 Dec 2012 at 9:26
The following is a proposed LZ4 release candidate r85
which concentrates on decoding speed improvements.
It integrates propositions 49, 50 and 54.
55 doesn't provide any benefit.
I would like to publish it, so that next release can concentrate on pointer
validation issues (51 & 52).
Original comment by yann.col...@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2012 at 11:43
Attachments:
Enhancement integrated into r85.
Original comment by yann.col...@gmail.com
on 11 Dec 2012 at 1:41
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
strig...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2012 at 6:51