Closed mark-watson closed 3 years ago
As someone who is deeply interested in Common Lisp and deeply uninterested in all other (alleged) lisps, I really hate when Common Lisp gets diluted with other (alleged) lisps.
Assuming this repo already lists Common Lisp companies only, how about renaming it to awesome-common-lisp-companies
?
Note that renaming a repo installs appropriate redirects, so no links would be broken.
Hi, Mark.
I know you from your books. Sorry. But I make this repo only for Scheme and Common Lisp companies.
Hi, Mark.
I know you from your books. Sorry. But I make this repo only for Scheme and Common Lisp companies.
I understand. Thanks for maintaining this list.
If such is the policy of this repo, then it might be worth to link to a list of Clojure companies at https://clojure.org/community/companies which is open for PRs at https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site/blob/master/content/community/companies.adoc
If the same thing happened again. I will point them to your comment. thanks, @phoe.
OK - thanks. I still consider that it might be worth to add this link to the bottom of the list, so that people will be able to find it if they search the page for the string Clojure
, but it's your decision at this point.
I decided not to. However Github search also include the string in the issues.
I usually use Common Lisp, but my current job at Olive AI uses Clojure almost exclusively.