Open b-steve opened 5 months ago
At the moment it's possible for the lower- and upper-limits of confidence intervals to be formatted very differently in the summary() table, which makes it very difficult to read. Here's an example:
summary()
> summary(fit2) Detection function: Hazard halfnormal Number of sessions: 18 Information types: Bearings Confidence interval method: Wald Parameters: Estimate Std. Error 2.5 % 97.5 % sigma 4.8853e+02 3.8151e+01 4.1920e+02 569.3316 lambda0 2.8754e+01 1.7186e+01 8.9109e+00 92.7819 kappa 5.2663e+01 1.3151e+01 3.2281e+01 85.9144 D.(Intercept) -5.4359e+00 3.4442e-01 -6.1110e+00 -4.7609 D.forest.typeevergreen 1.0082e-01 1.9741e-01 -2.8609e-01 0.4877 D.canopy.height 2.3157e-01 1.1206e-01 1.1938e-02 0.4512 D.villages 6.3481e-05 2.1107e-05 2.2113e-05 0.0001
At the moment it's possible for the lower- and upper-limits of confidence intervals to be formatted very differently in the
summary()table, which makes it very difficult to read. Here's an example: