b12smurf / acer-liquid-community-rom-bugtracker

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/acer-liquid-community-rom-bugtracker
1 stars 1 forks source link

Unlinear volume scales on Eclair ROMs #92

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Take any volume control (notification, ringtone, system, media,...)
2. Set it half way -> sound almost unaundible
3. Only last third of the scale is useful to increase/decrease the volume

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
A linear volume scale, using the full range of the available scale and not 
only the last third of this scale (eg: when setting the volume for media 
on 7/15, this should really represent 50% of the maximum volume, and not 
10 or 20 % as it is now)

Waht is the bin file you are using ? (0.010, 0.014, 0.016, 1.100...)
1.100

What version are you using ?

What patch or addons pack have you installed ?
LCR 1.6. But the issue is the same with the stock bin

Where are stored your apps (phone/sd default is phone) ?
sd. But irrelevant.

Where is stored your dalvik-cache (phone/sd default is phone) ?
phone. But irrelevant.

Where are stored your datas (phone/sd default is phone) ?
phone. But irrelevant.

Did you wipe dalvik ?
Yes

Did you wipe data (factory reset)
Yes

Please attach a log made with sendlog or log_debug tool (see wiki)
NA

Please provide any additional information below.

I have a recurring "issue" since I left Donut for Eclair : despite sound 
hacks, the sound is almost inaudible until the volume control reaches 2/3 
of the available scale (eg: 5/7 for alerts, 10 or 11/15 for media,...). 

The volume increase/decrease should be more linear, so that the whole 
scale of the control is useful instead of the last 2 - 3 increments. It 
means that when the cursor on the media, ringtone, system,... volume 
control is positioned half its way, this should really represents 50% of 
the maximum volume, and not just 10 or 20 % like now.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by oli.jacq...@gmail.com on 19 May 2010 at 12:28