In the design phase a "reinforcement instruction" may be constructed as in the attached images. (See also attached doc).
This is very similar to what is described in the issue about mapped zones (https://github.com/bSI-InfraRoom/IFC-Specification/issues/358).
What is described here is a "screen" with longitudinal and lateral (roof/wall) extensions with a couple of design parameters:
Sprayed concrete thickness
Bolt length
Bolt spacing/pattern
Reinforcement class
Compare this with the modelling of individual bolts in an as-built model.
Do we cover this in the current IFC Tunnel proposal or do we e.g. need an Entity for this "screen" to which the design properties may be assigned?
Se also issues:
358 : Similar way of describing/mapping zonal features
484 : Design vs as-built information for injection
485 : general issue about design vs as-built properties
In the design phase a "reinforcement instruction" may be constructed as in the attached images. (See also attached doc). This is very similar to what is described in the issue about mapped zones (https://github.com/bSI-InfraRoom/IFC-Specification/issues/358). What is described here is a "screen" with longitudinal and lateral (roof/wall) extensions with a couple of design parameters:
Compare this with the modelling of individual bolts in an as-built model.
Do we cover this in the current IFC Tunnel proposal or do we e.g. need an Entity for this "screen" to which the design properties may be assigned?
Se also issues:
358 : Similar way of describing/mapping zonal features
484 : Design vs as-built information for injection
485 : general issue about design vs as-built properties
Bolts design.docx