How about adding clj-reload in `:dev`?

[teodorlu]

Please answer the following questions and leave the below in as part of your PR.

• [ ] This PR corresponds to an issue with a clear problem statement.

  • No issue covers this PR.

• [ ] I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file with a description of the addressed issue.

  • I don't think adding a library for local development warrants a CHANGELOG entry.

• [ ] I have considered whether I should add more tests covering the code I've changed.

  • I don't think adding a library for local development warrants adding more tests.

---

I've become accustomed to have tonsky/clj-reload available in the development profile. I missed clj-reload yesterday specifically to unload tests that no longer exist in the source files.

What do you think, is it OK to add clj-reload in local development?

[borkdude]

I'm fine with this only if you're not forced to use it. Is that the case?

[teodorlu]

Yes—This PR only puts the dep on the classpath, no need to use the :dev alias or use the dependency if you don't want to.

I don't think introducing a "forced way to reload Neil" is helpful; it's a small code base with no in-memory state, just being able to start a REPL and work is enough for me.