Closed DanielRuf closed 5 years ago
If you are asking whether there are more functional and more stable compression engines available, then you have answered your own question. This project's tight integration with Babel however makes it a promising candidate if more development time is invested. Whether this will happen or not... well trying to divine the open-source crystal ball is a pointless endeavor.
Keep in mind that babel-minify is marked as beta currently.
Okay, thanks for the info and clarification. This answers my question(s).
Going to write up something for this in a bit (and I'll update the readme to be more clear). I think @bardiharborow has it correct: the general idea makes sense so I don't think we would want to drop it, but currently there isn't enough people working on it so we should just signal that better.
edited: https://github.com/babel/minify/pull/947
https://github.com/babel/minify/commit/6b8bab6bf5905ebc3a5a9130662a5fef34886de4
Is babel-minify still relevant? Because terser is very good, and closure-compiler is still one of the best.
Additionally butternut is not actively developed and has several issues - for example the compression throws errors in projects.