Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This can already be done via HttpContext.ClearError so it would unnecessarily
end up
duplicating the same functionality in ELMAH. Also filtering errors for logging
is
fundamentally different than suppressing them altogether. The best place to
make the
latter decision is at the actual site of the code that can be the subject of
certain
set of expected run-time errors. The error filtering feature was primarily
added
because many people running large web sites found that the log could quickly
fill up
with noise from errors that were actually to be expected and safe to ignore
(the
most frequently quoted examples were 404s and HttpRequestValidation).
Original comment by azizatif
on 25 Jun 2007 at 8:28
Then you cannot do this if you use the configuration version of the exception
filtering. Since the configuration has no way to swallow an exception, you
must
use the 'code' solution for exception filtering.
It would be very easy to add a configuration option to do this so that we could
use
just configuration without putting in code to install the error handler.
Original comment by wayne.br...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2007 at 3:00
I would suggest separating filtering errors from suppressing them. The latter,
if
needed in a global and configurable way, should be implemented as a separate
module
because it may be based on a different set of conditions entirely. You could
then
leverage all the same assertions infrastructure from ELMAH in that module.
Could you
give a concrete example of the conditions you use to swallow/suppress
exceptions in
your web application today?
Original comment by azizatif
on 27 Jun 2007 at 4:50
Googlebot causes exceptions in asp2.0 applications when it accesses
webresource.axd
(or when cached images of site are displayed). The exception is:
System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: Padding is invalid and
cannot
be removed.
Another example is System.FormatException: Invalid character in a Base-64
string.
System.Web.HttpException: The client disconnected. --->
System.Web.UI.ViewStateException: Invalid viewstate.
Original comment by wayne.br...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2007 at 5:35
Thanks for getting back with those examples because it helps to clear up the
discussion with concrete scenarios. Isn't filtering precisely what you want
here
though? In other words, the error is still returned to the user agent (e.g. a
500 to
Googlebot) but you don't want to be bothered by it in your logs and mail. If
you
suppress the error on the server then the user agent gets back a 200 response,
which
runs the risk of something like Googlebot caching as a logically invalid
reponse for
the request.
Original comment by azizatif
on 27 Jun 2007 at 8:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
wayne.br...@gmail.com
on 23 Jun 2007 at 12:08